By Benjamin Yount Illinois Statehouse News
SPRINGFIELD – Scott Lee Cohen may have collected a hundred thousand signatures that he didn’t need.
The now independent candidate for governor filed over 133,000 voter signatures as part of his bid to unseat Gov. Pat Quinn. That’s more than 100,000 more than is required by state law, and may end-up being way more than needed as well.
Quinn’s campaign is content to let the Democratic County Chairman’s Association check and possibly challenge Cohen’s paperwork.
Campaign spokeswoman Mica Matsoff said “The Democratic Party organization…is making sure the requirements to get on the ballot are met.”
It’s common for political rivals to challenge the others’ paperwork. And it’s quite common for that tactic to work and knock a candidate out of the race.
But former state elections boss, and current University of Illinois at Springfield professor, Ron Michaelson said the sheer number of Cohen’s signatures has rendered that tactic pointless.
Illinois law requires 25,000 signatures for independent and third party candidates. The law requires just 5,000 signatures from Republicans or Democrats running for governor. Cohen’s filed paperwork easily surpasses both requirements.
But that doesn’t mean Cohen is a lock for the fall ballot.
Michaelson says there are two court decisions that could keep the Chicago pawnbroker turned political wannabe out of the race.
Matsoff is silent on the potential of a court challenge. She said the campaign is letting the party organization handle any challenges right now.
Cohen’s campaign is also not talking about a possible legal fight. But the candidate himself said earlier this week he thinks it will be tough for anyone to keep him off the November ballot.
Anyone hoping to challenge Cohen’s paperwork has until next Monday.
But Michaelson said the key date doesn’t come until September when the Illinois State Board of Elections certifies the ballot.
Before that, though, there court be a court fight which could test the intent of Illinois’ election law.
But Michaelson says that intent should be clear.




Thanks for this article and the information from Mr. Michaelson.
I’d like to point out that in 1986, Adlai Stevenson won the Democratic primary for Governor, but dropped out as a Democrat and then ran for Governor as a new party called Solidarity Party. He did this when two LaRouchie candidates also won the Democratic primary for Lt. Gov. and Comptroller. Stevenson wanted to run as an independent but the filing deadline had already passed for independents at that time. The filing deadline for independents was later ruled unconstitutional in Lee v. Keith in 2006.
Also, when Cohen won the primary, Quinn was asked if he would do what Stevenson did in 1986 if Cohen did not drop out, and Quinn indicated that is something he might have to do.
If the Illinois Democrats try to kick Cohen off in the courts because he ran in the primary, they will be contradicting both what they have done and said in the past. Are the Democrats now saying that in 1986 Adlai Stevenson should not have been allowed to run for Governor after winning the Democratic primary and dropping out? That is exactly what Cohen is doing, and what Quinn might have done if Cohen hadn’t dropped out for Lt. Gov.
Illinois needs election reform badly, with ending the gerrymandering and unequal ballot access laws right at the top.