By Bill McMorris Illinois Statehouse News
CHICAGO — A panel convened by Republican lawmakers to review Gov. Pat Quinn’s early prisoner release program drew input from all sides of the criminal justice system on Wednesday save one — Democratic lawmakers.
Call it a side effect of an election year.
The panel met at the James R. Thompson Center in Chicago to discuss the Department of Corrections program that led to the early release of 1,700 inmates last year. It first met in Peoria earlier this month, where some interested Democratic lawmakers stopped by and were welcomed on to the panel.
Now both parties are trading accusations of politicizing one of the election year’s biggest scandals. State Rep. and former prosecutor Dennis Reboletti, R-Addison, said he believed Democrats snubbed Wednesday’s meeting as a way to obstruct further investigation into the early prisoner release program.
The governor’s office has dismissed the hearings as partisan tools in a tough election year, a sentiment shared by state Sen. Dave Koehler, D-Peoria, who sat in on the first panel held in Peoria.
“What’s unfortunate is the timing — this close to election year,” he said. “This is a serious issue, but it’s being used as a political football.”
Koehler was joined by two other Peoria-area Democrats during the first panel, Reps. Mike Smith and Jehan Gordon. Though all three essentially came as uninvited guests, Koehler said the panel was able to get past partisan sniping and delve into serious dialogue.
“I almost didn’t go because this was rumored to be a political event,” he said. “There was some real good testimony from people looking not just at early release, but reforming the whole system.”
The panel was formed earlier this month after repeated attempts to investigate the program were blocked by Democrats in the General Assembly. Republican leaders gave the group an air of formality with the title “Illinois Joint Investigatory Committee on Early Release,” although it does not have legal standing with the General Assembly.
The lack of recognition has not stopped the panel from inviting on public safety policy-makers, including Department of Corrections head Michael Randle and former judge David Erickson, who led the state’s investigation into the program.
Randle balked at the invitation, but Erickson sent a note indicating he could meet with the lawmakers when his teaching schedule at Kent University Law School allowed it. The former judge released his review on the Meritorious Good Time program on Aug. 13, just two days after the panel met for the first time.
That report, which categorized the program as a “failure,” provided the foundation for Wednesday’s meeting. While the panel was made up of only one political party, it featured an array of views. The committee heard from prosecutors and defense attorneys between testimony from victims’ rights groups and ex-convicts.
The testimony, both for and against good behavior credits, could have little effect without legislative backing. Koehler said he has talked with Senate President John Cullerton, D-Chicago, about forming such a panel after the Nov. 2 election.
“We would be happy to join a truly bi-partisan panel–but only after the election,” he said.
But Sen. Kirk Dillard, R-Hinsdale, said there are unanswered questions about the program that go beyond politics, including the whereabouts of dozens of inmates released early, along with who designed the program.
Chicago’s meeting is the last one scheduled by the panel.




I THINK YOU SHOULD BRING BACK GOOD TIME.IM A VOTER AND I KNOW ALOT OF FAMILY ARE HURT BECAUSE OF THEY STOP IT THE PERSON WHO STOP IT ARE GOING TO LOSE ALOT OF VOTES